In Part
II, chapter 4 of Crime and Punishment,
we learn that Razumikhin has been trying to clear the name of a painter who
been charged for the murders of Alyona and Lizaveta Ivanova. Coincidentally, the
man was working in an empty apartment next to the pawnbrokers and was in
possession of jewelry that had been pawned to the old woman. I thought that the
idea of blaming someone else for Raskolnikov’s actions added an interesting
twist to the story’s plot for a couple of reasons. First, Raskolnikov is a dishonest
man who does not take responsibility for his actions without having a justified
excuse. I think that punishing someone else for his heinous crimes will make
Raskolnikov believe that he can get away with more wrongdoings. However, I also
think that holding someone else responsible for the murders will greatly
increase Raskolnikov’s sense of guilt, further leading to the collapse of his
character. On another note, I feel like the story is really starting to unfold
and I like where it is headed. I think that some of the other characters are
starting to suspect a connection between Raskolnikov and the murders.
Razumikhin seems to be growing especially suspicious of Raskolnikov, stating, “he
takes no interest in anything, he does not respond to anything except one point
on which he seems excited--that's the murder." In
addition, it appears that Raskolnikov is losing what little sanity he had left.
In a conversation with an inspector leading the murder investigation,
Raskolnikov jokes that he knows an abundance of information regarding the
murders. Although Raskolnikov is clearly a conflicted character with an
internal struggle between right and wrong, I was still dumbfounded by this
conversation. Seriously, what kind of murderer does this!? He practically
confessed to the police, while simultaneously trying not get caught. It makes
no sense. Clearly, his mental health is on a rapid decline.
-Alex
No comments:
Post a Comment