Alex response part IV

I agree with both of my partners’ opinions on Chapters 1-3 of Part IV. Both Madie and Gabe made several valid points in discussing these chapters. All three of us share similar thoughts in regard to Svidrigailov. He is an odd character who will most likely prove essential to the plot later in the novel. Like Madie said, there is definitely something mysterious about Svidrigailov, which indicates that Dostoyevsky has not yet revealed everything about his character. I agree with Madie’s belief that Raskolnikov’s recent righteousness marks the beginning of a drastic personality change. I understand why Gabriel disagrees with this theory because it is too early to judge Raskolnikov’s definite intentions. However, after everything Raskolnikov has sacrificed for Dunya and his mother, I honestly do not think that he would run away from the only stable aspect of his life. On another note, Gabe brought up a very interesting point by questioning whether Raskolnikov is being noble by protecting his family from the pain they will feel if he is found guilty of the murders, or if he is just trying to conceal himself from the law and hide from the consequences. Quite honestly, I can’t answer this question because even though Raskolnikov has gone to great measures to protect his family, he is still an incredibly selfish and cruel character who would not surprise me if he betrayed those who truly cared for him. Lastly, I like how Gabe and Madie both pointed out that some good is clearly beginning to surface in Raskolnikov’s personality as he realizes that there is not much else he can do to avoid the truth about the murders. Like Madie said, regardless of whether Raskolnikov is trying to run or protect his family, he does not want them to be associated with him and his wrongdoings. I am excited to see if Raskolnikov is actually trying to better himself as a person and regain some of the conscience that was lost.

Alex